ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Omalizumab as an Adjunct to Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Food Allergy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biologic-assisted immunotherapy for pediatric food allergy: a systematic review.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food allergy represents a growing public health concern, particularly among pediatric populations, where it significantly impacts quality of life and carries the risk of severe reactions. Traditional management through allergen avoidance and emergency medications fails to address the underlying immune dysfunction, prompting interest in active treatments like oral immunotherapy (OIT). However, OIT alone is often limited by safety concerns and variable efficacy, leading to the exploration of adjunctive therapies such as omalizumab treatment to enhance outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the role of omalizumab combined with OIT in pediatric food allergy, aiming to synthesize current evidence on its clinical benefits, safety profile, and potential to induce lasting tolerance. A comprehensive search was conducted across four major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase) following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated omalizumab as an adjunct to OIT in children with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy and reported measurable clinical outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using standardized tools. A narrative synthesis was performed due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcome reporting. The results indicate that omalizumab enhances the safety and efficacy of OIT, with consistent improvements in desensitization rates and reductions in adverse events during treatment. The adjunctive use of omalizumab appears particularly beneficial for high-risk patients and those undergoing multi-allergen OIT, facilitating faster dose escalation and better tolerability. However, evidence on sustained unresponsiveness remains inconsistent, and long-term outcomes require further investigation. The safety profile is favorable overall, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Omalizumab represents a promising adjunct to OIT in pediatric food allergy, offering a more manageable and effective treatment approach for selected patients. While current evidence supports its use in improving short-term outcomes, additional research is needed to establish standardized protocols, evaluate cost-effectiveness, and clarify its role in achieving long-term tolerance. Clinicians should consider this combined therapy as part of a personalized treatment strategy while remaining mindful of uncertainties and individual patient needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.