ArticleCureus2025
Multidisciplinary Surgical Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma With Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venous Tumor Thrombus Level in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Impact on Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.Cancers · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Case Report: En bloc resection of inferior vena cava and renal cell carcinoma with level IV tumor thrombus associated with tumor thrombus embolization to the pulmonary arteries: presence of blood vessels inside the tumor thrombus.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus occurs in a minority of cases but carries important prognostic implications, underscoring the need for timely and multidisciplinary management. Despite significant perioperative risks and surgical complexity, radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy remains the standard treatment. A structured, multidisciplinary preoperative approach has been reported to improve outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the multidisciplinary team (MDT) surgical approach in the management of RCC with IVC thrombus and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods This retrospective study included all adult patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy in the Uro-Oncology Unit between January 2012 and February 2024. All cases were managed by the surgical MDT following a comprehensive preoperative review. Assessed outcomes included 30-day mortality, operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, and oncological outcomes. Results Fourteen patients (mean age: 52.1 ± 9.8 years; 92.86% male) were included. Most had a Mayo level II thrombus. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%, and Clavien-Dindo class III-IV complications occurred in two patients. The mean operative time was 360 ± 121.2 minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 3000 mL. No significant differences were observed in operative time (p = 0.31) or blood loss (p = 0.55) between lower and higher thrombus levels. The median hospital and ICU stays were 12 and six days, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 19.5 months, the overall survival (OS) rate was 78.57%, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 92.86%. Although OS was lower in patients with metastasis, the difference was not statistically significant. Eight patients developed new metastases during follow-up. Conclusion The surgical MDT approach in the management of RCC with IVC tumor thrombus was associated with improved perioperative outcomes. These findings highlight the potential benefits of MDT involvement in managing this complex condition and support further investigation in larger, comparative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.