Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630329›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Delay adaptation does not transfer between discrete button press actions and continuous control.

Loes Cj van Dam, Svenja Kernig, Karina Lazarova, Melisa Ünal, Nicole Gappa, Benjamin Straube, Thomas Sa Wallis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loes Cj van DamTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0590-9347
Svenja KernigTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-7913
Karina LazarovaTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.
Melisa ÜnalTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.
Nicole GappaTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.
Benjamin StraubeCenter for Mind, Brain and Behavior, University of Marburg, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Technical University of Darmstadt, Marburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-0944
Thomas Sa WallisTechnical University of Darmstadt (TU Darmstadt), Department of Human Sciences, Institute for Psychology/Centre for Cognitive Science, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-4852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When interacting with technology, humans often deal with delays between an action and the desired action outcome. Through delay adaptation these delays will become less detrimental to visuomotor performance over time. Delay adaptation has been shown for a variety of tasks and control modes, from simple button presses causing a beep or flash to continuous target-tracking tasks. Here we investigated whether the delay adaptation is specific for the control mode used, when the task itself remained unaltered. To this end, participants performed a target tracking task in which they controlled a cursor item either by moving a stylus on a graphics tablet or by pressing the arrow keys on a keyboard. We found that delay adaptation occurred for both these types of control modes, but observed no transfer to the other control mode. This indicates that delay adaptation is specific to the control mode used during adaptation.

Indexed as

adaptation transferdelay adaptationtarget trackingvisuomotor control

Identifiers

PMID40630329
PMCPMC12235500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.