Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630274›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2025

Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Involvement in CKD Research.

Talia Gutman, Dale Coghlan, Jonathan C Craig, Chandana Guha, Allison Jaure, Shilpanjali Jesudason, Adeera Levin, David M White, Javier Recabarren Silva, Anita van Zwieten and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Patient involvement in nephrology research.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Talia GutmanSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dale CoghlanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jonathan C CraigCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Chandana GuhaSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Allison JaureSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Shilpanjali JesudasonCentral Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Adeera LevinThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
David M WhiteAmerican Association of Kidney Patients, US Food and Drug Administration Patient Engagement Advisory Committee.
Javier Recabarren SilvaSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anita van ZwietenSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David TunnicliffeSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrea K ViecelliDepartment of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Armando Teixeira-PintoSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Siah KimSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen McDonaldAustralia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Carmel M HawleyAustralasian Kidney Trials Network, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicole Scholes-RobertsonSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Limited consumer involvement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) research may reduce its relevance, impact, and transferability into practice and policy. We aimed to describe the current landscape of consumer (patients with CKD and caregivers) involvement in published CKD research. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to August 2023. Articles describing consumer involvement in CKD research were eligible. All text were imported into NVivo for line-by-line coding using descriptive synthesis of these domains: defining involvement, purpose of involvement, selection, stages of the research, resources, and evaluation. Results: We included 106 articles that involved over 4500 consumers from 15 countries. Eighty-two articles (77%) defined consumer involvement, using 8 different terms. Forty-three articles (41%) addressed reasons for involving consumers in research. Consumers were predominantly identified through clinical or patient networks based on demographic or clinical characteristics. Those involved at higher levels (e.g., coresearcher/patient partner) often had medical or academic training. Consumers were rarely drivers or commissioners of research ( Conclusions: Consumers were mostly involved in discrete activities with limited decision-making power. Increasing financial, logistical, and training resources for consumers may support more meaningful involvement. Ongoing evaluation of processes or impacts of consumer involvement, including consistent reporting, is needed to strengthen evidence and practice in CKD research.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseconsumer involvementpatient involvementresearch collaboration

Identifiers

PMID40630274
PMCPMC12232971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.