Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630227›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025

Longitudinal Evaluation of Listening Effort and Speech Perception in Noise in CROS and BiCROS Hearing Aid Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

Samet Kılıç, Deniz Tuz, Emre Gürses

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samet KılıçFaculty of Health Sciences, Audiology Department Trakya University Edirne Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-4565
Deniz TuzFaculty of Health Sciences, Audiology Department Ege University İzmir Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-2940
Emre GürsesFaculty of Health Sciences, Audiology Department Hacettepe University Ankara Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5157-7227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to longitudinally investigate the effects of using CROS/BiCROS hearing aids on the listening effort and speech perception in noise skills of individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD). Methods: Nineteen people with SSD who were going to use CROS/BiCROS hearing aids for the first time participated in the study. Participants were evaluated before they started using hearing aids and after 1 week, 3, and 6 months after they started using them. In every session, a dual-task paradigm was applied to measure listening effort, and the Turkish Matrix Test (TM) was applied to measure speech understanding performance in noise. The dual-task paradigm was evaluated at three different individual signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) determined according to the subjects' TM performance. Repeated measures ANOVA tests were used to evaluate whether the participants' dual-task paradigm and TM performances differed according to sessions. Results: A significant difference was observed between both the dual-task paradigm and TM scores according to measurement time ( Conclusion: This is the first study to longitudinally examine how CROS/BiCROS hearing aid use affects both speech-in-noise ability and listening effort. As a result of this study, it was seen that the use of CROS/BiCROS increased speech understanding performance in noise and reduced listening effort after starting to use them. Furthermore, as the use of the device continued, it was observed that speech performance in noise increased and listening effort decreased over time.

Indexed as

BiCROSCROSlistening effortsingle‐sided deafnessspeech perception in noise

Identifiers

PMID40630227
PMCPMC12230864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.