ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2025
Responding to avian influenza in poultry farms in Victoria, Australia.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Responding to avian influenza in poultry farms in Victoria, Australia.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe a multi-agency public response to an outbreak of avian influenza virus in poultry farms in Victoria, Australia, in 2024. Methods: After detecting an outbreak of high-pathogenicity avian influenza at a poultry farm and notifying the Victorian health department, Agriculture Victoria identified a further seven infected premises through tracing and surveillance activities. Testing at the Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness identified high-pathogenicity H7N3 at seven premises in the Golden Plains Shire, and high-pathogenicity H7N9 at a property in the Terang region in the Corangamite Shire. The Victorian health department established a multi-agency incident management team, and we defined, identified and managed contacts and suspected cases. Public health actions included influenza vaccination, antiviral prophylaxis, active surveillance of high-risk contacts, and supporting infection prevention and control measures. Findings: We identified a total of 212 (165 high- and 47 low-risk) unique human contacts with residence locations spread across 25 local government areas. We identified 20 suspected cases from six of the eight infected premises, all of whom tested negative for influenza A. Of the 172 unique high-risk contacts and suspected cases, local health services and clinics reported that 19.2% (33) received antiviral medication and 27.3% (47) received the seasonal influenza vaccine. Conclusion: Our rapid, coordinated, multi-agency response was a success; however, governments, agricultural industries and health workers must strengthen preparedness and response strategies across national, state, regional and local levels to improve surveillance, foster collaboration and address gaps in preventive health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.