ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Adverse event profile of five anti head and neck squamous cell carcinoma drugs: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a significant global health concern, with treatment outcomes for advanced or metastatic stages being suboptimal despite the availability of various targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This study evaluates five FDA-approved anti-HNSCC drugs-cetuximab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab-focusing on the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with their use as reported in the WHO VigiAccess database. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on ADR reports from the WHO-VigiAccess database, focusing on demographic information (age, gender, and geographical distribution) and ADR classification. The disproportionality analysis was used to identify ADRs through Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR). ADRs were categorized into 27 system organ classes (SOCs) for comparison across the five drugs. Results: A total of 145,678 ADR reports were analyzed. Cetuximab exhibited the highest incidence of skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (20.88%), while durvalumab showed elevated respiratory system disorders (18.53%). Pembrolizumab and nivolumab had notable immune-related adverse events, with malignant neoplasm progression reported at 5.56% and 4.23%, respectively. Atezolizumab was primarily associated with blood and lymphatic system disorders (5.51%). Disproportionality analysis revealed significant safety concerns for each drug, such as skin toxicity for cetuximab, respiratory complications for durvalumab, and reproductive system risks for nivolumab. Conclusion: This comparative pharmacovigilance study highlights the diverse safety profiles of the five anti-HNSCC drugs. Clinicians should consider these ADRs when treating patients, especially elderly individuals or those with comorbidities. Personalized monitoring strategies should be developed to minimize risks and optimize therapeutic outcomes for HNSCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.