Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40630070›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2025

Maintaining well-being during COVID-19: a follow-up study of community dwelling older people in New Zealand.

Susan Waterworth, Deborah Raphael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Susan WaterworthSenior Lecturer, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9909-4195
Deborah RaphaelResearch Fellow, School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older people are often viewed as a vulnerable group, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, with associated images of passivity and lack of agency. In contrast, we know that older people are resilient and have ways of managing adversity. This study aimed to explore how older people managed their well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand. Methods: This study applied a unique approach by following up a sample of older people from our previous research exploring their well-being and how they managed their well-being. Semi-structured interviews were conducted building on the participant's previous interviews and earlier responses. Results: Fourteen participants participated in the follow-up study. Despite the challenges associated with lockdown, participants were creative in adapting to their situation, maintaining their positivity, connecting with others using social media, and continuing to engage in activities they valued. Conclusions: Understanding the approaches and factors that influenced older people's well-being can be a guide for nurses working with older people, providing health communication and adapting approaches to meet their needs. The need for access to technology and being able to use the technology to enhance well-being practices are important factors. As disparities can arise, in for example access and ability to use technology, individualised assessments by nurses are required.

Indexed as

COVID-19older peoplequalitative studywell-being

Identifiers

PMID40630070
PMCPMC12231929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.