ArticlePhytochemical analysis : PCA2025
Call for Standardizing Uncaria rhynchophylla as the Sole Origin of Uncariae Ramulus cum Uncis.
Article in Phytochemical analysis : PCA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Call for Standardizing Uncaria rhynchophylla as the Sole Origin of Uncariae Ramulus cum Uncis.Phytochemical analysis : PCA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUncariae Ramulus cum Uncis (URCU) is a widely used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for treating neurodegenerative disorders. The Chinese Pharmacopeia recognizes five Uncaria species as authorized botanical sources of URCU; however, there is currently no established quality control method for individual species. Furthermore, significant variations in the chemical profiles among these species have been reported.
objectiveChemical analysis methods were established to evaluate the five species in terms of chemical profile and resource availability, as to determine which species should be preferred as the official source(s).
methodTen batches of URCU sample were collected from various regions of China for each of the five species of URCU. Among five species, only UR can be obtained from herbal medicine market, whereas the other four species were sourced from the wild. All samples identities were confirmed by herbarium specimen authentication, morphological identification, and microscopic identification. Twelve alkaloids were identified in the five species, and a UPLC-DAD assay method targeting six marker alkaloids was developed and validated.
resultsOnly UR and UM demonstrated the most stable chemical profiles and agreement with published literature. UR mainly contains corynoxeine, isocorynoxeine, rhynchophylline, and isorhynchophylline, whereas corynoxine, corynoxine B, rhynchophylline, and isorhynchophylline dominate in UM.
conclusionThis study comprehensively evaluated the chemical variations among the five officially recognized URCU species using a UPLC-DAD method. It brings important implications for quality control and standardization of URCU. Considering chemical stability and supply availability, UR is recommended as the sole botanical source for URCU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.