ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2025
Estimation of receiver operating characteristic curve when case and control require different transformations for normality.
Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The receiver operating characteristic curve is a popular tool for evaluating the discriminative ability of a diagnostic biomarker. Parametric and nonparametric methods exist in the literature for estimation of a receiver operating characteristic curve and its associated summary measures using data usually collected from a case-control study. Since the receiver operating characteristic curve remains unchanged under a monotone transformation, the biomarker data from both cases (diseased subjects) and controls (non-diseased subjects) are often transformed based on a common Box-Cox transformation (or other appropriate transformation) prior to the application of a parametric estimation method. However, careful examination of the data often reveals that the biomarker values in the diseased and non-diseased population can only be normally approximated via different transformations. In this situation, existing estimation methods cannot be directly applied to the heterogeneously-transformed data. In this article, we deal with the situation that biomarker data from both diseased and non-diseased population are normally distributed after being transformed with different Box-Cox transformations. Under this assumption, we show that existing methods based on a common Box-Cox transformation are invalid in that they possess substantial biases. We move on to propose a method to estimate the underlying receiver operating characteristic curve and its area under the curve, and investigate its performance as compared to the nonparametric estimator that ignores any distributional assumptions as well as the estimators based on a common Box-Cox transformation assumptions. The method is exemplified with HIV infection data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.