Trial reportJournal of evidence-based integrative medicine
Efficacy of Dry Needling Combined with Eccentric Exercise Versus Oral and Topical NSAID Treatment in Patients with Tennis Elbow: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of evidence-based integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe study aimed to compare the effects of a combined intervention of dry needling and eccentric exercises versus oral and topical NSAID treatment, each combined with eccentric exercises, on pain intensity and hand function in patients with lateral epicondylalgia.DesignA single-blind, randomized controlled trial.MethodsA total of 111 participants with LE were randomly assigned to three groups: Dry needling plus eccentric exercise, Oral treatment plus eccentric exercise, and Topical treatment plus eccentric exercise. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and pressure pain threshold at the lateral epicondyle, medial epicondyle, radial styloid, and ulnar styloid. Functional impairment was measured using the HAND10 questionnaire. Statistical analysis included repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc tests.ResultsAll groups showed significant improvements in pain intensity and function over the 30-day intervention period The DN group achieved the most substantial reduction in pain and the greatest improvement in pressure pain threshold and functional scores, followed by the TopA group. The OralI group demonstrated the least improvement across all measures. Significant differences were found between the three groups,with the dry needling group outperforming both Oral and Topical treatment groups in pain relief and functional outcomes.ConclusionThe combination of dry needling and eccentric exercises was more effective in reducing pain and improving hand function compared to NSAID-based interventions. These findings support the use of dry needling as an adjunct therapy to eccentric exercises for the management of lateral epicondylalgia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.