SynthesisAnnals of cardiac anaesthesia2025
Effectiveness of Pecto-Intercostal Fascia Plane Block in Reducing Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Cardiac Surgery Involving Sternotomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of cardiac anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Combined Pectoserratus and Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Plane Blocks for Cardiac Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of Pecto-Intercostal Fascial Block Vs Transversus Thoracic Plane Block and Their Pharmacogenomics for Pain Management After Sternotomy in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Chronic sternal pain relief after a pecto-intercostal fascial plane block: A case report.Interventional pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe pecto-intercostal fascia plane block (PIFB) is gaining recognition for its potential to reduce postoperative opioid use after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PIFB compared with conventional intravenous regimens in reducing total postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. A meta-analysis of relevant studies, published up to August 13, 2024, retrieved from the PubMed and CENTRAL databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies involving a superficial parasternal block or PIFB for patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. Studies comparing PIFB with other blocks or local anesthetic regimens were excluded. Data analysis was performed using an inverse variance random-effects model using RevMan 5.4.1 software, with the effect measure expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) to account for the different opioids used. Of 88 studies retrieved in the literature search, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria [ten ultrasound (US)-guided and six non-US-guided]. PIFB significantly reduced total opioid consumption [SMD -1.55 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.95); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -1.22 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.38); P < 0.001]. A subgroup analysis of multiple- versus single-shot injections yielded consistent results. Analyses including only US-guided PIFB revealed consistent reductions in total opioid consumption [SMD -1.18 (95% CI -1.79 to -0.56); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.01 to -0.63); P < 0.001]. PIFB effectively reduced opioid consumption and shortened postoperative time to extubation in cardiac surgery involving sternotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.