ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025
Assessing Atopic Dermatitis Control in Chinese Patients: Validation of the Chinese Version of Recap of Atopic Eczema Questionnaire (RECAP) and an Investigation into Its Interpretability.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Preparation and pharmacological study ofBiomedical reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of a validated Chinese version of the Recap of Atopic Eczema questionnaire (RECAP) questionnaire limits its applicability. This prospective study, conducted at a Chinese tertiary hospital between April and November 2024, aimed to evaluate measurement properties of the Chinese RECAP. Participants completed RECAP and reference instruments at baseline, 1-3 days, and 4-6 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated through hypothesis testing, while reliability was assessed using standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCagreement). Interpretability of both single and change scores was examined using anchor-based methods. In total, 153 adults with atopic dermatitis (AD) (mean age 28.4 years, 51.0% male) were included, with approximately half having moderate-to-severe disease. Of the predefined hypotheses, 57.1% (single score) and 71.4% (change score) were confirmed. The SEMagreement was 1.99, and the ICCagreement was 0.96. Final RECAP bandings were established, with a binary cutoff of ≥ 11 defining uncontrolled AD. The Smallest Detectable Change was 5.5. while the Minimally Important Change was 3.5 using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) method and 0.6 after adjustment via predictive modelling. Our finding confirmed that the Chinese RECAP is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool for evaluating eczema control. An improvement of ≥ 6 represents a real and clinically meaningful change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.