Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629659›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

Gender disparities in ophthalmology academic conferences in Japan.

Hiromi Onouchi, Akemi Iwasaki, Yuka Morita, Mariko Itakura, Keiko Kunimi, Yoichi Manabe, Naoko Kato

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiromi OnouchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, International University Health and Welfare, Atami Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Akemi IwasakiOtaki Eye Clinic, Chiba, Japan.
Yuka MoritaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tsukuba University Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Mariko ItakuraMaebashi Minami Eye Clinic, Gumma, Japan.
Keiko KunimiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoichi ManabeOtaki Eye Clinic, Chiba, Japan.
Naoko KatoMinamiaoyama Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6670-2043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a rise in the number of female physicians, their underrepresentation persists. This disparity grows with increasing academic rank, resulting in the loss of professionals within academic medical institutions. The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender disparity in the Academy of Ophthalmology in Japan. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The number of the first presenters and moderators in 24 of the Japanese academic congresses held in 2023 was assessed. Data of the first presenters and moderators were collected from the website or abstract book of each congress. Gender and the nationality (Japanese or non-Japanese) of the first presenters and moderators were estimated from their given names and photographs. The study comprised 1325 (25.2%) women and 3933 (74.8%) men across all congresses. Among them, 1116 (27.2%) of the first presenters and 209 (18.0%) of the moderators were women. When the sessions were classified into 4 categories as nominated/guest/special lectures, award lectures, symposium/instruction/educational lectures, and free paper/posters, female representation was 24.5%, 20.7%, 20.9%, and 31.4% among first presenters, and 17.0%, 11.4%, 16.3%, and 21.6% among moderators, respectively. The percentage of non-Japanese first presenters was 1.3% in women and 1.4% in men, and 2.4% and 0.0% in the moderators, respectively. The participation rate of women and non-Japanese individuals in the academic congresses of ophthalmology in Japan is remarkably low. In contrast, Japanese men account for the majority of participants, highlighting a significant imbalance. This suggests a lack of diversity within the society's membership.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicOphthalmologyPhysicians, WomenSexismFemaleHumansJapanMaleRetrospective Studiesdiversitydomestic congressfirst presentergender disparitymoderator

Identifiers

PMID40629659
PMCPMC12237381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.