Observational studyMedicine2025
Gender disparities in ophthalmology academic conferences in Japan.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite a rise in the number of female physicians, their underrepresentation persists. This disparity grows with increasing academic rank, resulting in the loss of professionals within academic medical institutions. The purpose of the present study is to investigate gender disparity in the Academy of Ophthalmology in Japan. A retrospective observational study was conducted. The number of the first presenters and moderators in 24 of the Japanese academic congresses held in 2023 was assessed. Data of the first presenters and moderators were collected from the website or abstract book of each congress. Gender and the nationality (Japanese or non-Japanese) of the first presenters and moderators were estimated from their given names and photographs. The study comprised 1325 (25.2%) women and 3933 (74.8%) men across all congresses. Among them, 1116 (27.2%) of the first presenters and 209 (18.0%) of the moderators were women. When the sessions were classified into 4 categories as nominated/guest/special lectures, award lectures, symposium/instruction/educational lectures, and free paper/posters, female representation was 24.5%, 20.7%, 20.9%, and 31.4% among first presenters, and 17.0%, 11.4%, 16.3%, and 21.6% among moderators, respectively. The percentage of non-Japanese first presenters was 1.3% in women and 1.4% in men, and 2.4% and 0.0% in the moderators, respectively. The participation rate of women and non-Japanese individuals in the academic congresses of ophthalmology in Japan is remarkably low. In contrast, Japanese men account for the majority of participants, highlighting a significant imbalance. This suggests a lack of diversity within the society's membership.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.