Observational studyMedicine2025
The current status and influencing factors of quality of life of chronic wound patients based on Wound-QoL scale: A cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI vs. MD: Benchmarking ChatGPT and Gemini for Complex Wound Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to establish the current quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic wounds and identify the factors influencing it. Convenience sampling was employed, and 223 patients with chronic wounds were recruited from a tertiary hospital in Deyang City between April 2023 and January 2024. Patients completed a demographic characteristics questionnaire, the Wound-QoL, the modified Barthel Index, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The impact of chronic wounds on the quality of life of the patients was analyzed through the linear regression analyses. The mean Wound-QoL score was 38.59 ± 10.92, with 4 domains: economic burden, psychological status, physiological status, and daily life, found to significantly influence wound QoL. Logistic regression revealed that the odds of QoL improvement were impacted by various risk factors, and multivariate linear regression identified the most significant ones: a wound area ≥100 cm², wounds located on the lower extremities, baseline anxiety scores of ≥7, and baseline depression scores of ≥7. Conversely, higher modified Barthel Index scores were predictive of poorer QoL (P < .05). These findings highlight that patients with chronic wounds generally exhibit low QoL, which is influenced by wound characteristics, psychological status, and daily activity limitations. Medical professionals should focus on these factors by implementing targeted strategies, including comprehensive wound care, enhancing functional independence, and addressing psychological well-being, to improve QoL and facilitate better wound healing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.