ArticleMedicine2025
Prediction of acute pancreatitis severity using NLR, procalcitonin, and CT severity score: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio With Post-Dural Puncture Headache After Cesarean Delivery.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- A Practical Guide to the Roles of Procalcitonin Measurement in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of the association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and liver injury complicating acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the clinical value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), procalcitonin (PCT), and computed tomography (CT) severity score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP). Additionally, we investigate their correlations with clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters to provide guidance for the early diagnosis and treatment of AP. This retrospective study included 300 patients diagnosed with AP at our hospital between December 2021 and December 2024. According to the Atlanta Classification, patients were categorized into mild AP (MAP) (225 cases), moderately severe AP (MSAP) (60 cases), and severe AP (SAP) (15 cases) groups. Clinical data, laboratory test results (including NLR and PCT), imaging assessments (CT severity scores), and clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed to assess the predictive value of these parameters in determining AP severity. With increasing severity of AP, patient age, duration of abdominal pain, incidence of complications, and length of hospital stay significantly increased (P < .01). Laboratory findings indicated that patients with SAP exhibited significantly elevated white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, PCT, blood glucose, bilirubin, and liver function markers. Specifically, PCT levels in MAP, MSAP, and SAP patients were (0.14 ± 0.05), (0.25 ± 0.10), and (0.52 ± 0.16) ng/mL, respectively, while NLR values were (1.23 ± 0.31), (1.55 ± 0.43), and (2.18 ± 0.57) (P < .01). The CT severity scores for MAP, MSAP, and SAP patients were (3.2 ± 0.7), (5.6 ± 1.1), and (8.1 ± 1.3), respectively (P < .01). CT severity score, NLR, PCT levels, age, and a history of diabetes were identified as independent predictors of AP severity. Notably, the combination of CT severity score, NLR, and PCT demonstrated superior predictive performance for AP severity. NLR, PCT, and CT severity score are effective predictive markers for assessing AP severity. Their combined application provides a more accurate prognosis, facilitating early evaluation and aiding clinicians in optimizing early intervention and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.