Observational studyMedicine2025
A novel technique for low-rectal cancer: Pushing the anus in laparoscopic radical resection.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In sphincter-preserving surgery for low-rectal cancer, it is significant to reduce the number of stapler cartridges and the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Therefore, this study introduces a new and safer technique in laparoscopic radical resection of low-rectal cancer to reduce the number of stapler cartridges used during operation and reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Information was collected on 237 patients with rectal cancer from the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between January 2015 and July 2020. In 151 cases, the surgeon used the stapler cartridges (Ethicon Intraluminal Linear Staplers EC60A, Ethicon) to transect the edge of tumor of the rectum (conventional surgery group; n = 151). In other cases, besides applying the stapler cartridges, the surgeon had the assistant push the anus forward from the perineum during the process of transecting the rectum (pushing the anus group; n = 62). The postoperative outcomes and complications were compared between the 2 groups. As a result, in terms of the number of the stapler cartridges, the pushing the anus group was less than the conventional surgery group (P < .001). Moreover, the incidence of anastomotic leakage in the pushing the anus group is lower than that in the conventional surgery group (P = .043). These results proved that with pushing the anus forward during the process of transecting the rectum, the sphincter-preserving surgery can be performed more safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.