Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629559›Full record

ReviewJournal of separation science2025

Revolutionizing Curcumin Extraction: New Insights From Non-Conventional Methods-A Comparative Analysis of the Last Decade.

Isabelle O Torquato, Astrid Corrales, Cassamo U Mussagy, Jorge F B Pereira, André M Lopes

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabelle O TorquatoBioseparations and Nanoformulations Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Lorena School of Engineering, University of São Paulo (EEL/USP), Lorena, São Paulo, Brazil.
Astrid CorralesBioseparations and Nanoformulations Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Lorena School of Engineering, University of São Paulo (EEL/USP), Lorena, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cassamo U MussagyLaboratorio de Desarrollo de Bioprocesos Sostenibles (Labisost), Escuela de Agronomía, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas y de los Alimentos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Quillota, Chile.
Jorge F B PereiraCERES, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Department of Chemical Engineering, Rua Sílvio Lima, Pólo II - Pinhal de Marrocos, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
André M LopesBioseparations and Nanoformulations Lab, Department of Biotechnology, Lorena School of Engineering, University of São Paulo (EEL/USP), Lorena, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development #88887.914337/2023.00National Council for Scientific and Technological Development #88887.940531/2024-00State of São Paulo Research Foundation #2017/10789-1State of São Paulo Research Foundation #2018/10799-0State of São Paulo Research Foundation #2023/11166-9State of São Paulo Research Foundation #2023/11967-1State of São Paulo Research Foundation #2023/13870-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Curcumin (CCM), derived from Curcuma longa L. rhizomes, holds significant pharmaceutical and biotechnological potential, driving extensive scientific research. Beyond its potent biological properties, the extraction of CCM has attracted considerable attention. Although numerous review articles have explored CCM extraction, a gap remains in the identification and comparison of methods aimed at improving these processes. This review seeks to address this gap by discussing efficient extraction methods that align with the principles of sustainability. It is essential to recognize that the effectiveness of both conventional and non-conventional extraction methods depends not only on the techniques themselves but also on the optimal combination of these methods with suitable solvents. Conventional solid-liquid extraction methods often rely on volatile organic compounds which, despite their widespread industrial use, present several limitations, including low-to-moderate extraction yields, prolonged extraction times, the risk of thermal degradation or chemical alteration of the target molecule, and significant environmental impact. In contrast, non-conventional, eco-friendly methods, such as ultrasound-, microwave-, and enzyme-assisted extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction, have garnered increasing attention. When combined with sustainable, neoteric solvents, these methods offer enhanced efficiency, selectivity, and environmental advantages. Future research should focus on optimizing and integrating these innovative extraction methods with green solvents to improve CCM yield, reduce environmental impact, and enhance scalability, ensuring alignment with sustainable practices in bioindustries.

Indexed as

CurcumaCurcuminChromatography, Supercritical FluidMicrowavesSolventsCurcuminSolventscurcuminoidseco‐friendlyenvironmental sustainabilitypurificationseparationsolvents

Identifiers

PMID40629559
PMCPMC12238703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.