ReviewJournal of separation science2025
Revolutionizing Curcumin Extraction: New Insights From Non-Conventional Methods-A Comparative Analysis of the Last Decade.
Review in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Extraction of Mangiferin From Mango Leaves Using Taguchi and Box-Behnken Optimization: Biochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Profiling.Journal of separation science · 2026Article
- Oil in Water Microemulsions Loaded with Natural Products Curcumin and Mangiferin Are Effective AgainstNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent Progress in Curcumin Extraction, Synthesis, and Applications: A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Curcumin (CCM), derived from Curcuma longa L. rhizomes, holds significant pharmaceutical and biotechnological potential, driving extensive scientific research. Beyond its potent biological properties, the extraction of CCM has attracted considerable attention. Although numerous review articles have explored CCM extraction, a gap remains in the identification and comparison of methods aimed at improving these processes. This review seeks to address this gap by discussing efficient extraction methods that align with the principles of sustainability. It is essential to recognize that the effectiveness of both conventional and non-conventional extraction methods depends not only on the techniques themselves but also on the optimal combination of these methods with suitable solvents. Conventional solid-liquid extraction methods often rely on volatile organic compounds which, despite their widespread industrial use, present several limitations, including low-to-moderate extraction yields, prolonged extraction times, the risk of thermal degradation or chemical alteration of the target molecule, and significant environmental impact. In contrast, non-conventional, eco-friendly methods, such as ultrasound-, microwave-, and enzyme-assisted extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction, have garnered increasing attention. When combined with sustainable, neoteric solvents, these methods offer enhanced efficiency, selectivity, and environmental advantages. Future research should focus on optimizing and integrating these innovative extraction methods with green solvents to improve CCM yield, reduce environmental impact, and enhance scalability, ensuring alignment with sustainable practices in bioindustries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.