Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629534›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of comparative neurology2025

"Of Marine Mammal Neuroscience and Men": Needs and Perspectives in Marine Mammal Neuroscience.

Ksenia Orekhova, Mark Dagleish, Nina Patzke, Simona Sacchini, Federica Giorda, Giovanni Di Guardo, Camilla Testori, Alice Affatati, Tommaso Gerussi, Mari Ochiai and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ksenia OrekhovaDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6664-494X
Mark DagleishDivision of Veterinary Pathology, Public Health and Disease Investigation, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Nina PatzkeFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Mind, Brain and Behavior, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany.
Simona SacchiniDepartment of Morphology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Campus Universitario de San Cristóbal, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Federica GiordaIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta-WOAH Collaborating Centre for the Health of Marine Mammals, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni Di GuardoVeterinary Medical Faculty of the University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Camilla TestoriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta-WOAH Collaborating Centre for the Health of Marine Mammals, Turin, Italy.
Alice AffatatiNational Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics-OGS, Trieste, Italy.
Tommaso GerussiDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0263-5635
Mari OchiaiSchool of Life and Environmental Science, Azabu University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Jean-Marie GraïcDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1974-8356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As neuroscience techniques become increasingly sophisticatedand accessible, their application to marine mammal research remainsunderdeveloped and fragmented. Cetacean and pinniped brains exhibit remarkableevolutionary specializations; yet systematic, reproducible data across speciesare scarce. Ethical, logistical, and methodological constraints hinder samplingand analysis of central nervous system tissues, often limiting studies to smallcohorts and reducing diagnostic accuracy in neuropathological investigations.Gaps persist in understanding neuroanatomical organization, pathogeneticmechanisms of neurodegeneration, and the effects of acoustic and environmentalstressors on brain health. Noninvasive neuroimaging methods such as post-mortemmagnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging offer promise butsuffer from incompatible protocols and limited standardization. In-vitro andmolecular techniques including cellular reprogramming may provide new avenuesfor translational research if harmonized approaches are adopted. We identify a criticalneed for coordinated efforts to standardize best practice protocols for the sampling, storage and systematic analyses of marine mammal nervous tissues. To this end, we propose the formation of an inclusive, multidisciplinary network and invitecollaboration through our Open Science Framework project. By aligning methodologies and broadeninginternational partnerships, we aim to transform marine mammal neuroscience intoa robust contributor to comparative neurobiology and environmental healthmonitoring. This is a call to action to collectively grow this emerging field.

Indexed as

BrainCaniformiaCetaceaNeurosciencesAnimalscommunitymarine mammalsmultidisciplinary collaborationneuroanatomyneuroimagingneuropathologyneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID40629534
PMCPMC12238701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.