ArticleJournal of cardiovascular imaging2025
Aortic valve leaflet motion for diagnosis and classification of aortic stenosis using single view echocardiography.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanically Informed Image Registration for Patient-Specific Aortic Valve Strain Analysis.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Biomechanically Informed Image Registration for Patient-Specific Aortic Valve Strain Analysis.ArXiv · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate classification of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains challenging despite detailed echocardiographic assessment. Adjudication of severity is informed by subjective interpretation of aortic leaflet motion from the first image parasternal long axis (PLAX) view, but quantitative metrics of leaflet motion currently do not exist. The objectives of the study were to echocardiographically quantify aortic leaflet motion using the PLAX view and correlate motion data with Doppler-derived hemodynamic indices of disease severity, and predict significant AS using these isolated motion data.
methodsPLAX loops from 200 patients with and without significant AS were analyzed. Linear and angular motion of the anterior (right coronary) leaflet were quantified and compared between severity grades. Three simple supervised machine learning classifiers were then trained to distinguish significant (moderate or worse) from nonsignificant AS and individual severity grades.
resultsLinear and angular displacement demonstrated strong correlation with aortic valve area (r = 0.81 and r = 0.74, respectively). Severe AS cases demonstrated global leaflet motion of 2.1 mm, compared with 3.6 mm for moderate cases (P < 0.01) and 9.2 mm for control cases (P < 0.01). Severe cases demonstrated mean global angular rotation of 11°, significantly less than moderate (18°, P < 0.01) and normal cases (47°, P < 0.01). Using these novel metrics, a simple supervised machine learning model predicted significant AS with an accuracy of 90% and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.96. Prediction of individual severity class was achieved with an accuracy of 72.5% and AUC of 0.88.
conclusionsAdvancing severity of AS is associated with significantly reduced linear and angular leaflet displacement. Leaflet motion data can accurately classify AS using a single parasternal long axis view, without the need for hemodynamic or Doppler assessment. Our model, grounded in biological plausibility, simple linear algebra, and supervised machine learning, provides a highly explainable approach to disease identification and may hold significant clinical utility for the diagnosis and classification of AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.