Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629447›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2025

The linguocultural concept of /pandemic/пaндeмия in Chinese, English, and Russian linguistic consciousness.

Yanlei Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yanlei GeRussian Department, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing, China. gylei2018@163.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7889-3409

Funding

Chinese Fund for the Humanities and Social Sciences 21WYYYB 007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a major public health event, the pandemic has been widely discussed across various academic disciplines. In the field of humanities, most pandemic-related studies use introspective methods such as description and interpretation, indicating to some extent subjective and one-sided conclusions. In this paper, pandemic-related linguistic information and linguistic big data serve as research materials. Based on the theory of linguocultural concepts, the study employed natural language processing methods such as the analysis of word frequency and collocation co-occurrence to conduct an in-depth empirical study of /pandemic/пaндeмия as a linguocultural concept in Chinese, English, and Russian linguistic consciousness from diachronic and synchronic perspectives.

methodsBased on the basic linguocultural theories, this study provides a comprehensive interpretation of the etymological data on the conceptual words /pandemic/пaндeмия, its lexical interpretation, and high-frequency words and co-occurring collocations related to the pandemic in Chinese, English, and Russian text corpora in Sketch Engine. The paper also analyzes reports from the mainstream media (People's Daily Online, BBC, and TASS) to depict and explain in detail the aspects of linguocultural concepts. The historical trends of the pandemic-related concepts in the three languages were examined by observing word frequency changes through Google Book Viewer. This hybrid empirical research framework, which combines cultural concepts with linguistic big data technology, made it possible to explore the content of linguocultural concepts in a more objective, comprehensive, and profound way.

resultsThe study revealed that: 1) In terms of etymology, the Chinese character (yi, pandemic) implies a belief that pandemics were created by ghosts and gods to render people immobile. The character (yi, pandemic) is also related to the concept of a fight. The English and Russian analogues (pandemic/пaндeмия) denote the same phenomenon: a disease that spreads widely among the whole population. 2) For more than 100 years since the twentieth century, pandemics have been a more significant part of Chinese consciousness than they have been in English and Russian cultures. 3) During the COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020-2023, the total number of news reports on (yi, pandemic) in Chinese was higher than the total number of news reports in English and Russian. This indicates that Chinese media tend to pay much more attention to the COVID-19 pandemic than media in the United Kingdom and Russia in all aspects. 4) China emphasizes the containment of domestic outbreaks through stringent, proactive, and comprehensive measures, including quarantine protocols, extensive testing campaigns, and evidence-based treatment strategies. On the contrary, the United Kingdom and Russia are more concerned with the global outcomes of the pandemic.

conclusionsThe present study objectively and comprehensively examined the similarities and differences in the perception of and response to the pandemic as a major health event in the Chinese, English, and Russian linguistic consciousness. This paper greatly contributes to the body of research in the field of humanities, broadening the scope of studies on public health events. The findings presented in this paper have relevance at both the theoretical and methodological levels. This study provides a linguistic foundation for cross-cultural public heath communication and also holds practical significance for promoting international healthcare cooperation.

Indexed as

COVID-19LanguageLinguisticsPandemicsChinaConsciousnessHumansNatural Language ProcessingRussiaDiscourse analysisEmpirical researchLanguage consciousnessLinguocultural conceptNovel coronavirusPublic health events疫/pandemic/пaндeмия

Identifiers

PMID40629447
PMCPMC12239291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.