ArticleParasites & vectors2025
Design and evaluation of a novel direct hemagglutination test based on a recombinant protein for diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis of hydatid cyst: from imaging to recombinant and nanobiosensor-based approaches.Infection · 2026Review
- Bioinformatics-Driven Design of Fusion Recombinant Protein (EgFABP1-EgTeg) for Enhanced Immunodiagnosis of Hydatid Cysts.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCystic echinococcosis (CE), one of the most important parasitic diseases, threatens global health for animals and, occasionally, humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis is crucial for effective disease management and control. Therefore, this study focused on designing and investigating a novel direct hemagglutination test (HAT) using a recombinant protein to diagnose hydatid disease.
methodsThe fusion protein IH4_Antigen_HisTag was designed by incorporating EgFABP1, EgTeg, and IH4 nanobody sequences. The fragment was cloned for expression in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) using the vector pET-28a. It was optimized through isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction. The results of a transfection were assessed using sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and western blotting. For consistency, a HAT was developed using O-negative red blood cells (RBCs) with standardized antigen concentrations. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, using serum samples from 43 patients with CE and 43 healthy controls.
resultsThe results of SDS-PAGE and western blot revealed that the size and concentration of the produced protein were 27 KDa and 126.1 μg/ml, respectively. The highest sensitivity (95%) and maximum specificity (95.3%) were observed at the cutoff point of the HAT equal to 0.09375 [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.972].
conclusionsThe HAT, as a test with low cost, ease of use, and no need for advanced equipment, has acceptable sensitivity and specificity in determining antibodies against the parasite. The IH4-Antigen-HisTag protein can be used in healthcare systems as a simple, cost-effective diagnostic tool for hydatid disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.