ArticleBMC biology2025
A reference genome enhances the power to detect signatures of recent anthropogenic impact in genomic data: a lesson learned from a stag beetle system.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Within-Island Diversification Generates Lineage-Specific Climate Vulnerability: Insights From the Taiwan-Endemic Formosan Duke.Evolutionary applications · 2026Article
- Chromosome-Level Reference Genome of an Endemic, Endangered Long-Armed Scarab (Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic Evidence of Low Contemporary Effective Population Size and Southern Genetic Reservoirs in an Island Endemic Epiphytic Orchid of Taiwan.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic data are vital for conservation biology and recent advances in sequencing technology have facilitated their applicability. However, the role of reference genomes in conservation planning remains largely underexplored. Specifically, while reference genomes can improve the accuracy of estimating genetic indices and help detect genomic regions under selection, they are still limited for non-model species. We explored whether a reference genome can help reveal novel insights not detected by previous genome-wide SNP analyses in a stag beetle system, especially in understanding recent demographic changes and local adaptation, which are critical information for conservation planning.
resultsWe used Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) to sequence and assemble a draft genome of an endemic stag beetle Lucanus miwai in Taiwan. With this newly generated genome map, we reanalyzed a previously published ddRADseq dataset. Our results revealed that the three geographical lineages of L. miwai exhibit varying levels of runs of homozygosity (ROH), with the lineage experiencing the most severe and recent habitat disturbance showing the longest ROH. Furthermore, the inferred timing and duration of a recent bottleneck coincide with historical records of recent habitat destruction. We also identified putative genomic regions showing signals of divergent selection between the lineages, indicating the importance of maintaining geographical lineages as separate conservation units.
conclusionsThe impact of anthropogenic disturbance among different geographical lineages of L. miwai can be detected using genomic data only when a reference genome is available. Furthermore, a reference genome helps us identify a genomic region that may have experienced a recent selective sweep. Our findings thus provide empirical evidence supporting the crucial roles of reference genomes in conservation planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.