ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
The impact of limited healthcare access among patients with light chain and transthyretin amyloidosis: real-world survey during COVID-19 lockdown period in France.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe containment strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic between December 2019 and 2022 significantly disrupted the healthcare system. Cardiac amyloidosis has a poor prognosis and requires frequent follow-up in reference centres.
objectivesTo assess the impact of limited access to healthcare on the patient burden and care pathway in France.
methodThis cross-sectional, self-questionnaire survey was conducted between June and October 2021 among cardiac amyloidosis patients registered at Expert Centres of the French Amyloidosis Network.
resultsOverall, 1015 patients participated of whom, 229 had light chain amyloidosis, 786 had transthyretin amyloidosis. Disrupted clinical follow-up was reported in 21.1% of respondents, 15% had follow-up visits postponed. No alternative follow-up option was proposed for 45% of these patients. Few patients reported treatment discontinuation (Light chain (1.1%), transthyretin (1.3%). Significantly more newly diagnosed light chain (37.9%) than transthyretin amyloidosis patients (30.4%) reported the containment strategies caused a poor initial work-up experience (p = 0.034). Among those patients who reported a COVID19 infection (9.7%) more patients with light chain amyloidosis (75.0%) were hospitalized than transthyretin amyloidosis (37.1%), (p = 0.006). Only 587 (57.0%) patients answered vaccination question, most (92.0%) reported having been vaccinated.
conclusionPatients with light chain amyloidosis reported having had a higher impact to their care management than transthyretin amyloidosis patients during the COVID19 pandemic containment periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.