ArticleBMC health services research2025
Radiographers' involvement in MRI research: factors driving and hindering participation in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) holds transformative potential for advancing clinical practice and professional growth in radiography. However, African radiographers face limited opportunities to engage in evidence-based practice through research. This study evaluates the level of MRI research engagement among, the factors motivating their participation, and the barriers impeding their progress.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 312 radiographers recruited through convenience sampling. Participants completed a self-administered online questionnaire via Google Forms. Due to the open online distribution through professional networks, a response rate could not be precisely calculated. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses assessed associations between categorical variables, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
resultsOf the 312 participants, 21.2% reported prior involvement in MRI research. Engagement was higher among radiographers with postgraduate qualifications (39.6%). Also, radiographers in academic roles were 47.4%, those working in both public and private facilities were 32.3%, and those with access to MRI scanners were 25.0%. Motivating factors included peer support (10.3%), membership in research groups (8.7%), research training (8.7%), and mentorship (8.3%). A significant association was observed between MRI scanner availability and interest in research (p = 0.0001). Barriers included insufficient funding (68.3%), time constraints (51.9%), and inadequate research skills (37.2%).
conclusionDespite a strong interest in MRI research, the surveyed cohort of radiographers from the 18 Sub-Saharan African countries encounter significant barriers, resulting in low engagement levels. Addressing these challenges through targeted training, mentorship, and the creation of dedicated research roles is essential to fostering evidence-based practice and innovation in radiography. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings emphasize establishing protected research time, fostering regional and international collaborations, and implementing structured skill development programs. Such measures can enhance research activity, promote innovation, and improve patient care and diagnostic outcomes in African radiography practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.