Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629312›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Family perceptions of prematurity, neurodevelopment, and early intervention: a qualitative study.

Nathália de Figueiredo Silva, Francelio Silva de Sousa Júnior, Beatriz de Oliveira Silva, Roseany Cavalcante da Silva, Hanna Lettícia Oliveira Lima, Carolina Daniel de Lima-Alvarez, Silvana Alves Pereira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathália de Figueiredo SilvaGraduate Program in Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Francelio Silva de Sousa JúniorDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Beatriz de Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Roseany Cavalcante da SilvaGraduate Program in Applied Sciences to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Hanna Lettícia Oliveira LimaGraduate Program in Applied Sciences to Women's Health, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Carolina Daniel de Lima-AlvarezGraduate Program in Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
Silvana Alves PereiraGraduate Program in Physiotherapy, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil. silvana.alves@ufrn.br.

Funding

Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement, (CAPES) Grant/Award Number: Code 001.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiven that family involvement is essential for both short- and long-term care of premature infants, it is critical to understand the family's perceptions on prematurity, neurodevelopment, and the need for early intervention.

objectiveTo explore family perceptions on prematurity, neurodevelopment, and early intervention. METHODOLOGY: This exploratory, descriptive, and qualitative study involved two focus groups and ten semi-structured interviews with family members of premature infants across three neonatal care settings: the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Kangaroo Care Unit, and Follow-up Clinic. The guiding script contained five questions aimed at understanding family perceptions of prematurity and their care for neurodevelopment, ranging from the support resources available during hospitalization to family involvement in intervention programs. Bardin's Content Analysis was employed for data inference and interpretation.

resultsA limited understanding of prematurity was identified among family members, along with their participation in neurodevelopmental care, highlighting the significance of their role in intervention programs. Families reported feelings of insecurity, particularly in the NICU, indicating a reliance on the care provided by the professional team. The Kangaroo Care Unit proved to be ineffective in fostering family autonomy in post-discharge care, as comments from families in outpatient follow-up suggested a lack of understanding regarding the need for continued care for the development of premature infants.

conclusionThe NICU environment appears to hinder parental engagement, leaving parents feeling insecure. The Kangaroo Care Unit was not fully effective in transitioning families to the home environment. Parents in outpatient follow-up exhibited limited understanding of prematurity-related issues.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentEarly Intervention, EducationalEarly Medical InterventionFamilyInfant, PrematureAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalInterviews as TopicKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMaleNeurodevelopmental DisordersQualitative ResearchEarly interventionFamilyPrematurity

Identifiers

PMID40629312
PMCPMC12235813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.