ReviewJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2025
Charting the future: current and future directions in translational research for individuals with Down syndrome.
Review in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The power of five - inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase gene mutations at the intersection of development and disease.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Between care and collapse: the hidden health and emotional struggles of Saudi mothers of children with Down syndrome.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Clinical, translational and developmental biomarkers associated with intellectual and developmental disabilities across the lifespan.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most common genetic cause of intellectual and developmental disability is trisomy of human chromosome 21 (trisomy 21) or Down syndrome. Relative to the general population, individuals with Down syndrome heterogeneously experience atypical morphogenesis, a distinct neurocognitive profile, and a unique spectrum of diverse medical conditions that impact every major organ system. How trisomy 21 results in the highly variable manifestations of Down syndrome remains largely unknown and an active area of heavy investigation with therapeutic implications. For example, common inflammatory and metabolic signatures have begun to emerge across various co-occurring conditions in Down syndrome with assorted impacts on diverse yet intertwined organ systems that could directly or indirectly impact brain health. Here, we review current progress, resources, knowledge gaps, and bottlenecks for precision medicine approaches to promote brain health across the lifespan among individuals with Down syndrome within the larger context of research efforts geared towards our other distinct yet intertwined organ systems. Within this framework, we advocate for interdisciplinary pursuit of systems-level biomarkers to facilitate holistic intervention strategies that precisely benefit individuals with trisomy 21 each experiencing Down syndrome in their own unique way. To this end, we quantitatively assess clinical studies that are actively recruiting participants with Down syndrome and provide historical context through summary figures sourced to user-friendly tables that have been curated from federal websites to empower efficient exploration of research opportunities for interdisciplinary collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.