ArticleRheumatology and therapy2025
Saudi Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and disease activity outcomes in a Saudi Arabian axial spondyloarthritis cohort.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis guideline offers evidence-based recommendations for physicians and policymakers on managing axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Saudi Arabia.
methodsA panel of 14 experts in research methodology, rheumatology, family medicine, and clinical pharmacology in Saudi Arabia approved 45 questions related to the monitoring and treatment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological, of different subtypes of axSpA. We conducted a search of different databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, from 2010 to 2024 to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical studies related to the diagnosis and management of axSpA. To evaluate the certainty of the evidence and formulate recommendations, we employed the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The expert panel voted electronically on each recommendation. A recommendation was finalized when over 70% of the voting panel agreed.
resultsWe issued 31 evidence-based recommendations and seven statements based on the experts' opinions, which are grouped into nine categories. This guideline recommends initiating non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the first-line therapy for patients with symptomatic axSpA. If NSAIDs are ineffective, second-line treatments such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis), interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17is), or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) should be considered. Localized glucocorticoid injections are suggested as supplementary therapy for cases of isolated sacroiliitis, enthesitis, or peripheral monoarthritis not responding adequately to the treatment options.
conclusionThe Saudi clinical practice guidelines provide updated evidence-based recommendations for monitoring and treating adults with axSpA. These recommendations help guide the best practice for healthcare professionals in managing patients with axSpA in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.