ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Issues in radiation dose measurement using electronic personal dosimeters during disaster relief activities.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we measured the radiation exposure of the medical relief team of the Japanese Red Cross Society (JRCS) members during the Noto Peninsula earthquake using electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) and investigated the frequency of electromagnetic interference (EMI) events that caused abnormally high dose readings.
methodsSix JRCS medical relief team members (two physicians, three nurses, and one logistics officer) involved in the Noto Peninsula earthquake disaster relief activities were provided with EPDs to measure their radiation exposure during the activity period. A background radiation dosimeter was also installed on-site to record ambient radiation levels.
resultsOver 2.5 days of disaster relief activities, the background radiation dose was 3.0 ± 3.0 μSv. However, the highest recorded dose among the team members was 2075.0 ± 207.5 μSv for a nurse, while the average dose for the other members was 40.0 ± 39.5 μSv. A significant radiation dose was observed despite no radioactive material dispersion.
conclusionsAmong the four individuals who exhibited abnormally high dose readings, three were operating digital devices at the time of measurement, suggesting a strong likelihood that electromagnetic interference was the cause. The effective management of radiation doses using EPDs during nuclear disasters requires the implementation of countermeasures against EMI from digital devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40629200What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.