ArticleJournal of human genetics2025
Hidden SVA retrotransposon insertion in BRCA1 revealed by nanopore targeted sequencing causes hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Article in Journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two cases of mosaic germline SVA insertions in SMARCB1: implications for rhabdoid tumour predisposition diagnosis.NPJ genomic medicine · 2026Article
- The role of Alu elements in causing BRCA1 structural variation and breast cancer susceptibility.Genes & genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In Japan, germline BRCA1/2 genetic testing is extensively used for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). However, inconclusive results sometimes complicate clinical management. In this study, we identified an intronic SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) insertion in BRCA1 of a proband and her mother, both of whom had inconclusive conventional BRCA1/2 genetic test results, by targeted long-read sequencing (LRS) through the application of nanopore adaptive sampling and Flongle genome amplicon sequencing. We further confirmed splicing aberrations using cDNA quantitative PCR with TaqMan probes and Flongle cDNA amplicon sequencing. Our findings highlighted that, in addition to conventional BRCA1/2 genetic testing, structural variation analysis using targeted LRS is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis of HBOC in certain cases. Furthermore, Flongle amplicon sequencing was demonstrated to be effective for sequencing regions refractory to conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing, particularly repetitive and GC-rich regions, such as retrotransposons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40629180What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.