Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
An exploration of the relationship between perceived injustice and pain severity in breast cancer survivors: a structural equation model.
Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04730154 (The Effect of Perceived Injustice Targeted Pain Neuroscience Education and Motivational Interviewing Compared to Biomedical Focused Education in Breast Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Perceived Injustice Targeted Pain Neuroscience Education and Motivational Interviewing Compared to Biomedical Focused Education in Breast Cancer Survivors
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of fatigue and sleep quality in the link between pain severity, perceived injustice and pain catastrophizing in breast cancer survivors with pain: a network analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe construct of perceived injustice is receiving increased attention in pain research due to its relationship with adverse pain outcomes. Even though cancer survivors face a 30% risk of developing pain, there is a notable lack of research exploring this relationship within this population. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationship of perceived injustice with pain severity in breast cancer survivors (BCS).
methodsA directed acyclic graph (DAG) (i.e., path model) was multidisciplinary created a priori, positioning perceived injustice -measured with the Injustice Experienced Questionnaire (IEQ)- as the main exposure variable and pain severity -measured with the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)- as the main outcome variable, with the addition of explanatory variables within the relationship of IEQ and BPI. Data from 156 female BCS with pain and perceived injustice were analysed using structural equation modelling, with confidence intervals estimated through Montecarlo simulation.
resultsPerceived injustice did not have a significant univariate direct relationship with pain severity (β = 0.186, p = 0.102). However, in the complete path model including explanatory outcomes, a significant relationship was observed (β = 0.304, 95% CI [0.136; 0.477]), explaining 22,5% of the variance in pain severity. In the complete model, the greatest proportion of the effect was mediated through pain catastrophizing (β = 0.226, 95% CI [0.101; 0.376]).
conclusionThe findings indicate that perceived injustice has an important relationship with pain severity levels of BCS experiencing pain and perceived injustice. Multimodal intervention studies are suggested for future investigation as a treatment for pain in BCS. REGISTRATION PRIOR TO RECRUITMENT AT: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04730154.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40629158What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.