ArticleLeukemia2025
Integration of [
Article in Leukemia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic evaluation of double-expressor lymphoma: prognostic impact, determinants of outcome, and comparative efficacy and safety of novel therapies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- The prognostic role of maximum tumor dissemination derived by PET/CT in oncological diseases: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Molecular biomarkers as key determinants of outcome in mantle cell lymphoma: results from the FIL V-RBAC trial.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Analysis of cell-free DNA in lymphomas: from sample collection to genotyping and minimal residual disease monitoring.Blood advances · 2026Review
- Article
- In mantle cell lymphoma, whether 18 F-FDG PET/CT or flow cytometry provide superior diagnostic performance compared to biopsy in the determination of bone marrow involvement and enhance prognostic predictive value.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Dual-utility ctDNA in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: integrated genotyping unveils minimal residual disease dynamics and subtype-specific clonal evolution.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based prognostic model for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma incorporating PET/CT imaging features.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic network connectivity in clinical staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Metabolic Bulk Volume is an independent prognostic factor and facilitates identifying high risk cases for DLBCL patients treated with the R-CHOP.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The prognostic and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification of relapsing/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents an unmet clinical need. A real-life cohort of newly diagnosed DLBCL (n = 120) treated with R-CHOP was investigated. Using the standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 4.0, PET/CT radiomics variables (SUVmax, tMTV, tTLG and Dmax) were collected. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis by CAPP-seq yielded baseline ctDNA levels and LymphGen molecular clustering. The best cut-off for both PET/CT parameters and ctDNA levels were identified by max-stat statistics. tMTV, tTLG and Dmax retained independent prognostic value when adjusted for ctDNA levels and were grouped together in a variable named high-risk PET. By multivariate analysis, ctDNA-high and high-risk PET independently predicted PFS and were combined into a 2-factor prognostic model (C-indices: 0.712 for PFS and 0.696 for OS). Molecular clustering, by capturing high-risk biological features of DLBCL, further improved outcome prediction. Consistently, BN2/EZB/ST2 clusters maintained an independent association with better PFS when adjusted for the 2-factor model variables and were therefore included in a 3-factor prognostic score (C-indices: 0.745 for PFS and 0.746 for OS), that identified a very high-risk group of patients (n = 22, 40-month PFS 12.1%) which should be prioritized for early response evaluation and for access to novel agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.