ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of sensitivity of rhesus and cynomolgus macaque for acute radiation effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiation medical countermeasure development under the United States Food and Drug Administration Animal Rule needs validated large animal models of acute radiation syndrome. Such a well-established large animal model is the rhesus nonhuman primate. The potential use of the rhesus for other high priority areas and limited supply of such animals emphasizes the need to validate other large animal models, in particular other macaque models, in order to compensate for the lack of rhesus macaques for radiation countermeasure development. Based on existing data, cynomolgus macaques, Macaca fascicularis, are a viable alternative, but need further characterization. Reliance on such animal models requires that the models are well validated. Data gathered from rhesus and cynomolgus macaques under the same experimental conditions are not available; therefore, the authors compared and contrasted here the radiosensitivity of both macaques receiving same levels of clinical support and exposed to same doses of total-body gamma-radiation, and at same dose rates using same radiation source. Under matched experimental conditions, significant differences between acutely irradiated rhesus and cynomolgus macaques relative to the rates of survival and blood cell changes were observed. The presented data demonstrate that the cynomolgus macaque is more sensitive to ionizing radiation exposure. Overall, data supports the concept that the cynomolgus macaque is a viable, potentially useful alternative large animal model for the evaluation of radiation medical countermeasures. For comparative purposes however, additional studies with both macaques under identical experimental conditions, such as levels of clinical support and different radiation qualities with males and females ran concurrently in future will be critically important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.