Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629060›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dishonest behavior can transition to continuous ethical transgressions.

Crystal Reeck, Dan Ariely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Crystal ReeckFox School of Business, Temple University, 1801 Liacouras Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. crystal.reeck@temple.edu.
Dan ArielyFuqua School of Business, Duke University, 1 Towerview Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethical decision-making research often focuses on singular events. However, in our daily lives we are regularly tempted to behave dishonestly, and little is known about whether and how repeated ethical deviations can worsen over time. Building upon research on dishonesty and moral disengagement, we test the effect of repeated transgressions on dishonesty. Across six experiments we provide evidence that repeated transgressions can lead to a transition to continuous dishonesty. Individual dishonest acts are thus not independent events, but rather can compound and perpetuate pervasive unethical behavior. We find that making one's self-interested actions more salient hinders the transition to continuous cheating, while unfair financial deprivation, self-serving rewards, and gradual change -- factors that previous research has shown to facilitate moral disengagement - all facilitate the transition to continuous cheating. Moreover, we show that moral disengagement mediates the effect of gradual change on the transition to continuous dishonesty.

Indexed as

DeceptionDecision MakingMoralsAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultDishonestyEthical decision makingMoral disengagementMorality

Identifiers

PMID40629060
PMCPMC12238545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.