ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of blastocyst development using cleavage-stage embryo metrics and maternal age.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for early blastocyst formation on day 4 post-fertilization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Cleavage-stage stratification reveals the clinical and developmental potential of 0PN embryos compared with 2PN embryos in IVF.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- From the Understanding of Maternal Molecules and Mechanisms to Predicting Embryonic Development.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In assisted reproductive technology (ART), predictive models are becoming increasingly important for improving pregnancy rates and reducing the risks associated with multiple pregnancies. The current standards for selective single-embryo transfer, especially the use of day 5 (D5) blastocysts, are known to enhance pregnancy outcomes. However, variability in embryonic development poses ongoing challenges, necessitating more accurate predictive tools for embryo viability. This study developed a novel predictive model to forecast D5 blastocyst viability using early cleavage stage embryo indicators. Based on a retrospective analysis of 764 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles, 13 key factors influencing blastocyst formation were identified. Multivariate analysis revealed four independent predictors, including the number of cleavage-stage embryos with > 10 cells, high-quality embryos, 2-pronuclei cleavages, and a menopause-related age metric. The predictive model was formulated and demonstrated high predictive accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.929. Diagnostic testing and internal validation using an independent cohort of 318 blastocyst culture cycles demonstrated that the combined predictor L performed better than the empirical prediction. This study highlights the importance of ART prediction, improving clinical decision-making, and reducing multiple pregnancy risks. This approach empowers patients and enhances the overall effectiveness of reproductive treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.