Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40629019›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effectiveness of machine learning models in diagnosis of heart disease: a comparative study.

Waleed Alsabhan, Abdullah Alfadhly

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Waleed AlsabhanDepartment of Software Engineering, College of Engineering, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. walsabhan@Alfaisal.edu.
Abdullah AlfadhlyKing Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise diagnosis of heart disease represents a significant obstacle within the medical field, demanding the implementation of advanced diagnostic instruments and methodologies. This article conducts an extensive examination of the efficacy of different machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models in forecasting heart disease using tabular dataset, with a particular focus on a binary classification task. An extensive array of preprocessing techniques is thoroughly examined in order to optimize the predictive models' quality and performance. Our study employs a wide range of ML algorithms, such as Logistic Regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neibors (KNN), AdaBoost (AB), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), CatBoost (CB), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to assess the predictive performance of these algorithms in the context of heart disease detection. By subjecting the ML models to exhaustive experimentation, this study evaluates the effects of different feature scaling, namely standardization, minmax scaling, and normalization technique on their performance. The assessment takes into account various parameters including accuracy (Acc), precision (Pre), recall (Rec), F1 score (F1), Area Under Curve (AUC), Cohen's Kappa (CK)and Logloss. The results of this research not only illuminate the optimal scaling methods and ML models for forecasting heart disease, but also offer valuable perspectives on the pragmatic ramifications of implementing these models within a healthcare environment. The research endeavors to make a scholarly contribution to the field of cardiology by utilizing predictive analytics to pave the way for improved early detection and diagnosis of heart disease. This is critical information for coordinating treatment and ensuring opportune intervention.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedHeart DiseasesMachine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID40629019
PMCPMC12238588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.