ReviewEuropean radiology2026
Evolution of CT perfusion software in stroke imaging: from deconvolution to artificial intelligence.
Review in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Infarction: Epidemiology, Classification, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management.MedComm · 2026Review
- Comparison of CT-perfusion software packages and validation with true infarct core in patients with acute ischemic stroke.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) represents one of the main determinants in the decision-making strategy of stroke patients, being very useful in triaging these patients. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge and the future applications of AI in CTP. This review contains a short technical description of the CTP technique and how perfusion parameters are currently estimated and applied in clinical practice. We then provided a comprehensive literature review on the performance of CTP analysis software aimed at understanding whether possible differences between commercially available software might have a direct implication on neuroradiological patient stratification, and therefore on their clinical outcomes. An overview of past, present, and future of software used for CTP estimation, with an emphasis on those AI-based, is provided. Finally, future challenges regarding technical aspects and ethical considerations are discussed. In the current state, most of the use of AI in CTP estimation is limited to some technical steps of the processing pipeline, and especially in the correction of motion artifacts, with deconvolution methods that are still widely used to generate CTP-derived variables. Major drawbacks in AI implementation are still present, especially regarding the "black-box" nature of some models, technical workflow implementations, and the economic costs. In the future, the integration of AI with all the information available in clinical practice should fulfill the aim of developing patient-specific CTP maps, which will overcome the current limitations of threshold-based decision-making processes and will lead physicians to better patient selection and earlier and more efficient treatments. KEY POINTS: Question AI is a widely investigated field in neuroradiology, yet no comprehensive review is yet available on its role in CT perfusion (CTP) in stroke patients. Findings AI in CTP is mainly used for motion correction; future integration with clinical data could enable personalized stroke treatment, despite ethical and economic challenges. Clinical relevance To date, AI in CTP mainly finds applications in image motion correction; although some ethical, technical, and vendor standardization issues remain, integrating AI with clinical data in stroke patients promises a possible improvement in patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40628986What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.