ArticleScientific reports2025
The influence of biological preparations on soil parameters and aclonifen removal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New isolates of Pseudomonas and Streptomyces as bioremediation tools for aclonifen removal.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food production requires the protection of agricultural crops against weeds, diseases and pests. An inherent consequence of using chemical plant protection products is the presence of their residues in the environment and the soil, and also in food. The use of effective microorganisms (EMs) that protect plants against pathogens and improve the condition of the soil, may be an alternative to and complement those preparations. The aim of this work was to examine the potential of biological preparations like Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBI600, Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134, Yarrowia lipolytica, and their consortia on the bioremediation of aclonifen contaminated soil. Experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions in the horticultural soil. The analyzed parameters included the aclonifen concentrations, and soil parameters of pH, dehydrogenase activity (DHA), and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP). The consortium of Pseudomonas sp. DSMZ 13134 with Y. lipolytica and the consortium of all three examined EMs most effectively influenced the aclonifen dissipation. Their use reduced the herbicide concentration in the soil by 52% and 56%, respectively. These results are significant as aclonifen is a persistent herbicide. The tested biological preparation also contributed to the improvement of soil properties - the increase in ORP and DHA. There is an urgent need to promote the use of EMs in agriculture, to protect the environment and human health from chemical contaminants, and to develop sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.