ArticleScientific reports2025
ResNet-based image processing approach for precise detection of cracks in photovoltaic panels.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning and deep learning models for predicting colorectal cancer metastases: A comprehensive review.European journal of radiology open · 2026Review
- Very short-term production prediction for photovoltaic plants using Temporal Convolutional Networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Design of Fluorescent Materials: Principles, Methodologies, and Future Directions.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- GNSS Interference Identification Driven by Eye Pattern Features: ICOA-CNN-ResNet-BiLSTM Optimized Deep Learning Architecture.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancing renewable energy solutions requires efficient and durable solar Photovoltaic (PV) modules. A novel mechanism based on Deep Learning (DL) and Residual Network (ResNet) for accurate cracking detection using Electroluminescence (EL) images of PV panels is proposed in this paper. Different kinds of ResNet architectures, where ResNet34, ResNet50, and ResNet152 were tested, came out with an F1-Score of 86.63%, 87.37%, and 88.89%, respectively. Although the accuracy for ResNet152 is slightly higher, ResNet34 was chosen as the best model since it gives us a trade-off between detection performance and computational performance. The main contribution in this research is the design of an efficient crack detection system trained on a large PV power dataset composed of 2000 EL images collected from different polycrystalline and monocrystalline cells. Although the dataset has some imperfections, to guarantee the presence of many cell states in each subset, it was split into training (70%), validating (20%), and testing (10%). This research demonstrates the application of advanced DL frameworks for early defect diagnosis from raw data to enhance PV panel maintenance, thereby bolstering the sustainability of solar systems. This research also has a significant impact on the academic industry, offering practical solutions for the renewable energy sector during periods of sustainable energy instability, particularly when new materials supplement PV panel usage. The technology preserves the efficiency of solar modules and encourages clean energy solutions by accurately identifying PV panel faults. The study lays a foundation for the further development of image-based defect detection methods in PV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.