Observational studyScientific reports2025
Contemporary outcomes in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A Hemodynamic Scoring System for Optimizing Transcatheter Arterialization of the Deep Veins in No-Option Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Superficial venous arterialization outflow stenting, an alternative to open venous branch ligation.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Predictors of Post-Amputation Complications in Major Lower Limb Amputations: The Role of WIfI Scoring and Pre-Amputation Transcutaneous Oximetry (TcPO2).International wound journal · 2025Article
- Limited Prognostic Value of Psoas Muscle Indices in Patients Undergoing Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Durable Long-Term Outcomes After Early Transcatheter Arterialization of the Deep Veins.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral artery disease, is increasing. A considerable portion are deemed "no-option" patients and have high rates of limb loss and death, with even worse outcomes in underrepresented populations. This study aimed to delineate real-world, contemporary outcomes in an observational study of no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia patients. The composite primary end point was amputation-free survival (defined as freedom from death and above-ankle amputation) at 1 year. A total of 180 patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia were included from 22 centers across the US. The median age was 70 years (IQR, 61-78 years), 33% were women, 39% were Black, and 11% were Hispanic/Latino. Comorbidities included 76% with diabetes, 33% with heart failure, and 25% with end-stage renal disease. At 1 year, the amputation-free survival rate was 37%, 45% had major amputation, and 33% died. Additionally, two-thirds of the remaining patients had persistent non-healing ulcers, 44% had minor amputation, and 83% required ambulatory assistance. In this severely diseased population, approximately half of patients underwent major amputation and one-third died within a year, highlighting the pressing need for innovative interventions for limb salvage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.