ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel obfuscation method based on majority logic for preventing unauthorized access to binary deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-directional CIM-based non-volatile SRAM for instant-on/off energy-constrained edge AI devices.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significant expansion of deep learning applications has necessitated safeguarding the deep neural network (DNN) model from potential unauthorized access, highlighting its importance as a valuable asset. This study proposes an innovative key-based algorithm-hardware co-design methodology to protect deep neural network (DNN) models from unauthorized access. The proposed approach significantly reduces model accuracy when an incorrect key is used, preventing unauthorized users from accessing the design. The significance and advancements of binary neural networks (BNNs) in the hardware implementation of cutting-edge DNN models have led us to develop our methodology for BNNs. However, the proposed technique can be broadly applied to various designs for implementing neural network accelerators. The proposed protective approach increases efficiency more than similar solutions across different BNN architectures and standard datasets. We validate our proposed hardware design using post-layout simulations using the Cadence Virtuoso tool and the well-established TSMC 40 nm CMOS technology. The proposed approach yields 43%, 79%, and 71% reductions in area, average power, and weight modification energy per filter in the neural network structures. Additionally, the security of the key circuit has been analyzed and evaluated against Boolean satisfiability-based attacks, structural attacks, reverse engineering, and power-based side-channel attacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.