ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of reinforcement learning and artificial neural networks for inverter control in improving the performance of grid-connected photovoltaic systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of effects of elevation on the power output and efficiency of ground-mounted photovoltaic modules.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Energy optimization of PV systems under partial shading conditions using various technique-based MPPT methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aims to explore the potential applications of artificial intelligence (AI) methods, such as reinforcement learning (RL) and artificial neural networks (ANN), in controlling inverter systems and enhancing the performance of photovoltaic (PV) systems. PV systems are essential for producing sustainable energy, as they improve the reliability and efficiency of renewable power resources by utilizing AI to control inverters. This study examines the application of AI techniques to manage PV systems, given the increasing importance of energy generation through PV systems on a global scale. The goal of the project is to investigate the potential applications of RL algorithms for achieving maximum power point tracking (MPPT) and managing PV system maintenance and operation. According to the results, control of the inverter by RL yields better results than the ANN controller in all cases. Globally, increasing the use of PV systems for energy generation is a top goal to satisfy rising energy demands sustainably. By improving efficiency and dependability, AI control of PV systems helps to meet this challenge and further efforts in environmental sustainability and energy security. In terms of efficiency, reliability, and overall system performance, the research findings demonstrate that RL-based control of inverters outperforms ANN controllers. This comparison highlights how well RL works to control PV systems adaptively and efficiently in various environmental conditions. Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) for both current and voltage is compared and evaluated under ramp and random conditions. The results show that by consistently achieving reduced THD values, the RL controller outperforms the ANN controller in both dynamic and uncertain scenarios. This study reveals that RL exhibits superior adaptability and achieves lower THD compared to ANN, particularly under varying operational conditions. This comparative analysis fills a significant research gap, as comprehensive evaluations of this nature have not been adequately addressed in previous works. These results highlight how RL approaches may increase the dependability and efficiency of PV systems, advancing sustainable energy technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.