Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628886›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Outcome of universal newborn hearing screening conducted in three referral hospitals in Cameroon.

Emmanuel Choffor-Nchinda, Naiza Monono, Audrey Mawota, Antoine Bola, Roger Christian Meva'a Biouélé, Adele-Rose Ngo Nyeki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Universal newborn hearing screening in Southwest Iran: coverage, risk factors, and outcomes in a large-scale population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Newborn hearing screening: outcomes and management of infants.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emmanuel Choffor-NchindaDepartment of Surgery and Specialties, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O. Box 63, Buea, Cameroon. ecnchinda@yahoo.com.
Naiza MononoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Audrey MawotaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Antoine BolaDepartment of Ophthalmology-Otolaryngology-Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Roger Christian Meva'a BiouéléDepartment of Ophthalmology-Otolaryngology-Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Adele-Rose Ngo NyekiDepartment of Ophthalmology-Otolaryngology-Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) is recommended for early identification of congenital hearing impairment (CHI). Evidence has shown that much of the impact of this condition can be mitigated through early detection and intervention. We sought to report findings of UNHS in a setting where it is not effectively implemented, describe the risk profile of potentially hearing impaired babies after screening, and determine factors associated with abnormal results. This was a hospital-based cross-sectional study carried out in three reference hospitals in Cameroon, for a period of three months from January to March 2024. We included all neonates born or admitted in any of these three facilities. Critically ill babies were excluded. A portable non-invasive otoacoustic emission (OAE) device was used. This device is exclusively used for screening, not diagnosis. Results were either "pass" or "refer", indicating that OAEs were either recorded or not detected respectively. A total of 215 babies were screened. Fifty-three out of 215 newborns had abnormal results (24.7%). Maternal age varied from 13 to 41 years, with a mean of 27.6 years. Among newborns with abnormal OAE results, maternal risk factors found were maternal alcoholism (23; 43.4%), family history of hearing loss (9; 17%), and infections (3; 5.7%). Neonatal risk factors were gentamicin administration (33; 62.3%), acute foetal distress/ neonatal asphyxia (19; 35.8%), and meningitis (7; 13.2%). Statistically significant risk factors identified on multivariate analysis included maternal alcoholism (adjusted OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.8, p = 0.002), the use of gentamicin (adjusted OR 5, 95% CI 2.3-10.8, p < 0.001), neonatal asphyxia (adjusted OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2-6.4, p < 0.001), and meningitis (adjusted OR 6.3, 95% CI 1.1-35.7, p = 0.04). Without UNHS, many children with CHI are probably missed at the time when they would benefit most from treatment. Despite the cost-effectiveness of screening methods, and the availability of hearing specialists in some hospitals in Cameroon, UNHS is still not implemented. Risk factors for CHI are common among babies born in Cameroon. Diagnosis and management of CHI should be preceded by preventive measures, which include good perinatal care and satisfactory control of risk factors.

Indexed as

Hearing LossHearing TestsNeonatal ScreeningAdolescentAdultCameroonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornMaleReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsYoung AdultCameroonCongenitalHearing lossNeonatal screeningSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID40628886
PMCPMC12238493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.