ArticleScientific reports2025
New insights into the first cervical vertebrae of Otavipithecus and Nacholapithecus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fossil hominoids are crucial to understand the selection pressures that played a role in the emergence of modern hominoid positional behaviors. Here we investigate the morphology of the atlas of Otavipithecus namibiensis (GSN BA 104'91, Namibia) and Nacholapithecus kerioi (KNM-BG 35250BE, Kenya) for identifying potential positional-related signals and discussing functional and evolutionary implications. Published data from GSN BA 13'21, a second Otavipithecus atlas from Namibia, were integrated. For comparative material, 105 atlases of extant catarrhines and platyrrhines were included. In addition to standard linear measurements, the morphology of GSN BA 104'91 and KNM-BG 35250BE was investigated by landmark-based geometric morphometric (GM) method and statistical analyses. The dimensions of the Miocene specimens fall within, or closely approximate to, the range of variation of Pan and Hylobates. Our GM analyses indicate that GSN BA 104'91 is more similar to Pan. When the right lateral mass only is considered, GSN BA 104'91 and KNM-BG 35250BE show similarities with hominoids and cercopithecoids. Our results possibly support a positional repertoire in Otavipithecus that would have been partly similar with extant hominoids, and in particular with Pan (e.g., terrestrial quadrupedalism, climbing), and the presence of a mix of hominoid-like and cercopithecoid-like traits in the axial skeleton of Nacholapithecus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.