Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Active learning algorithm for alleviating the user cold start problem of recommender systems.

Toon De Pessemier, Bruno Willems, Luc Martens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toon De PessemierGhent University, Belgium, Imec, Belgium, Waves, iGent - Technologiepark 126, Ghent, 9052, Belgium. toon.depessemier@ugent.be.
Bruno WillemsGhent University, Belgium, Imec, Belgium, Waves, iGent - Technologiepark 126, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Luc MartensGhent University, Belgium, Imec, Belgium, Waves, iGent - Technologiepark 126, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in recommender systems is how to profile new users. A popular solution for this problem is to use active learning strategies. These strategies request ratings for a small set of carefully selected items to reveal the preferences of new users. In this paper, we propose a new decision tree-based algorithm for selecting these items. Treating the recommender system as a black box, the ratings collected from interviewing new users are passed on to the recommender system with the intention of improving its performance. Extensive offline evaluation with two data sets and various recommender algorithms shows that our algorithm does indeed improve the performance of the underlying recommender algorithm if users are able to rate most of the items that are presented to them during the interview. However, online evaluation with 50 real users could not prove that our algorithm does indeed have a positive impact on the performance of the underlying recommender algorithm. This reveals the discrepancy between offline and online evaluations of active learning techniques applied in the context of recommender systems. This is due to the fact that real users are not always able to rate the item selected by the active learning algorithm and therefore cannot provide the requested information, in contrast to many machine learning scenarios where the labeling of all samples is possible. Hence, further research is required to provide more certainty regarding the impact of active learning strategies on recommender algorithms.

Indexed as

Active learningDecision TreesRecommender SystemsUser Cold Start

Identifiers

PMID40628876
PMCPMC12238261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.