ArticleScientific reports2025
A transformer-based architecture for collaborative filtering modeling in personalized recommender systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- O²RDL-net for joint risk classification and delay forecasting in logistics systems using interaction amplified deep.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analyzing digital consumer insights through RoBERTa LLM based sentiment analysis and topic modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Exploring vision transformers for deep feature extraction and classification in video genre recognition for digital media.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Metadata driven malicious URL detection using RoBERTa large and multi source network threat intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting student mental health through entropy-based features and interpretable cross-attention transformer networks.PloS one · 2026Article
- Feature centric based deep learning approach for music mood recognition with HuBERT transformer model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recommender systems are considered powerful tools, in the modern era, for filtering a huge amount of information and delivering personalized content, particularly in domains like e-commerce, social media, and entertainment. In the context of movie recommendations, accurately modeling user preferences based on past interactions, ratings, and contextual metadata is crucial for enhancing user satisfaction. With the rising trends and influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI), advanced models are increasingly being employed to enhance the precision and adaptability of such systems. This study proposes a novel transformer-based architecture, MetaBERTTransformer4Rec(MBT4R), designed to outperform state of the art existing methods in the relevant literature. The extensive empirical analysis is carried out on two datasets which based on the same source, publicly available known as MovieLens, which is a standard dataset for movie recommendation. The proposed model utilizes a self-attention mechanism to effectively capture sequential dependencies and contextual relationships, enabling deeper understanding of users' preferences. The results reveal that MBT4R achieves the lowest RMSE of 0.62, MAE of 0.45, and highest R² of 0.39, significantly superior to the benchmarks established by traditional models including machine learning (DT, KNN, RF, XGB), matrix factorization (SVD) and deep learning (GRU). This research highlights the effectiveness of AI techniques in improving the accuracy and personalization of recommendation systems focusing on enhancing user satisfaction by accurately predicting user preferences and delivering tailored film suggestions. It also provides a pathway for future advancements in personalized user experiences across entertainment platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.