Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40628868›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Numerical analysis of coal rock gas dynamics disaster risk in coal thickness variation area and research on prevention and control.

YunRu Jian, Chenglin Tian, Xu Wang, Yong Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

YunRu JianCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.
Chenglin TianCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China. skdtcl@126.com.
Xu WangCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China.
Yong SunCollege of Resources, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Taian, 271019, Shandong, China. skd996768@sdust.edu.cn.

Funding

National natural science foundation of China (NSFC) 52278359Project funded by open fund of state key laboratory of coal mine disaster dynamics and control 2011DA105287-FW202203Qingdao postdoctoral funding program QDBSH20230202074Shandong Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation,China SDCX-ZG-202400203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the mining process of deep coal mines, the coal thickness variation zone is highly prone to coal-rock-gas dynamic disasters. In order to promote the sustainable development of coal resource exploitation and utilization, the numerical simulation was carried out based on COMSOL software. The dynamic disaster mechanism of coal rock gas in the coal thickness variation area was revealed and corresponding prevention and control measures were given. Research shows that the stress concentration degree in the coal thickness variation area is higher. Compared with the non-variation area, the peak stress concentration coefficient increases by 29.4%, with the maximum value being 2.29. There is a temporary increase zone of gas pressure in front of the working face, with the maximum gas pressure reaching 0.82 MPa. The plastic zone in the coal thickness variation area is unevenly distributed, and the plastic deformation of the coal body in the thick coal zone is relatively large. The coal thickness variation zone and the thick coal zone accumulate a large amount of gas expansion energy. The gas expansion energy contained in the unit volume of coal obtained from the simulation is more than six times the elastic energy of the unit volume of coal and rock mass. The gas expansion energy plays a dominant role in disasters. When the coal seam is excavated from thin to thick in the coal thickness variation zone and thick coal zone, the peak energy criterion in the area near the working face is greater than 1 and keeps increasing, indicating that dynamic disasters occur and the degree of harm gradually increases. Comprehensive analysis shows that excavation from thick to thin is more likely to induce rock burst than excavation from thin to thick. Excavation from thin to thick is more likely to cause coal and gas outbursts than excavation from thick to thin. Practice shows that when using the high-pressure water jet slit drilling technology to prevent and control dynamic disasters in the coal thickness variation area, the reasonable slit spacing of coal seam drilling should be set at 3 m, and the average pure amount of gas extracted per hole is 2.6 times that of the ordinary drilling without slits. The hole spacing for drilling in coal seams of equal thickness and coal thickness variation areas should be set at 6 m and 8 m respectively. The stress peak is transferred to the deep part, which can effectively reduce the gas expansion energy and weaken the concentrated stress of the coal seam, and at the same time achieve the purpose of preventing outburst and eliminating protrusions.

Indexed as

Coal-rock-gas dynamic disasterCoal thickness variationElastic energy of the roof plateEnergy criterionHigh pressure water jet

Identifiers

PMID40628868
PMCPMC12238257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.