ArticleScientific reports2025
Occupational injuries associated with safety climate among ceramic industry workers in Iran.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceived Work-Related Health Effects and Associated Factors Among Grinding Workers in Sagamu, Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
- Safety Climate and Occupational Injuries in the Iron and Steel Industries in Tanzania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study conducted a descriptive analysis of non-fatal physical injuries and safety climate in the Iranian ceramic industry from 2020 to 2023. The following risk factors (independent variables) were examined in this study: age, gender, work experience, work shift of workers, time of occurrence of injury, injured body part, severity of injury, and outcome of injury. Occupational injury prevalence rates as dependent variables were used to analyze the injury data. The safety climate was evaluated using the NOSACQ-50 questionnaire. Results showed a rising trend in the prevalence rate of occupational injuries from 2020 to 2023. The men in the age group of 38-43 years' experience the most occupational injuries. The highest frequency of injuries happened in the morning shift at 10 o'clock, and workers with less than one year of experience were most affected. Fingers were the most injured part, and trauma was the most common outcome. The highest injury rates occurred in squaring, cutting, and packaging workplaces. The findings also indicated that workers generally have a poor level of safety climate (the mean safety climate score: 2.88), which highlights their excessive risk-taking behavior and lack of safety prioritization. Compared to the non-injury groups, the injured groups' safety climate score was lower. This study suggests that the ceramics industry may be able to lower occupational injuries by improving workplace safety climate dimensions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.