ArticleScientific reports2025
Leveraging hybrid model for accurate sentiment analysis of Twitter data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid CNN-LSTM approach for large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis with explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A unified multimodal learning framework for sentiment analysis and mental health indicators from YouTube videos.Discover mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sentiment analysis has emerged as a vital tool for gauging public opinion in today's fast-paced digital environment. This study examines the use of advanced artificial intelligence techniques to analyze sentiments derived from Twitter, a leading platform for real-time social media engagement. By utilizing Twitter's vast dataset, the research implements a comprehensive pre-processing pipeline that incorporates natural language processing (NLP) techniques such as tokenization, stop-word removal, and stemming to prepare the textual data for analysis. For feature representation, the study employs Bi-Directional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) networks, which are highly effective in identifying sequential patterns within text data. The extracted features are then input into a Logistic Regression model with optimized hyperparameters to classify sentiments as positive or negative. Experimental results highlight the efficacy of this integrated approach, achieving an impressive 81.8% precision, 83.4% recall, 82.5% F1-score, and 82.32% accuracy. These outcomes underscore the strength of combining Bi-LSTM and Logistic Regression for sentiment analysis, offering a robust framework for analyzing unstructured textual data in social media contexts. This approach demonstrates significant potential for enhancing sentiment classification tasks in the ever-evolving digital landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.