ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy of measuring lysophosphatidylcholine levels in human cerebrospinal fluid to differentiate myelopathy from cauda equina syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal stenosis frequently involves multiple regions, particularly the cervical and lumbar spine. Therefore, it is essential to identify biomarkers that can distinguish between central and peripheral neuropathy. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), a biomarker involved in neuropathic pain, has been proposed as a potential diagnostic biomarker for distinguishing these conditions. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of LPC levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for differentiating peripheral neuropathy from central neuropathy. This study included 198 patients: 77 with cauda equina syndrome (CES), 34 with myelopathy, and 87 controls. CSF samples were collected by lumbar puncture. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, six LPC species, including (16:0), (18:0), (18:1), (18:2), (20:4), and (22:6), were measured in the CSF. These LPC levels were compared among the groups, and the cutoff levels that could efficiently discriminate between the groups with high accuracy were determined. All levels of LPC species were significantly higher in the CES and myelopathy groups than in the controls, with CES showing the highest levels. LPC (18:1) and LPC (22:6) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing CES from myelopathy. LPC (18:1), LPC (18:2), LPC (20:4), and LPC (22:6) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing myelopathy from controls. The LPC species levels in CSF offer a reliable biomarker for differentiating CES from myelopathy. Measuring LPC species can enhance diagnostic accuracy, enabling precise treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.